Opportunity mapping
We interview the people doing the work and trace where time, money and errors actually accumulate. The output is a list of candidate use cases grounded in observed process, not in a workshop whiteboard.
Find the right first move before you build.
Most AI programmes do not fail on the model. They fail because the wrong thing got built first — a use case picked because it was easy to demo, not because it moved anything. This engagement exists to stop that happening. We spend two to four weeks inside the business, come back with a ranked set of opportunities, and are specific about which one to start on and what it is worth.
A fit when
You leave with
We interview the people doing the work and trace where time, money and errors actually accumulate. The output is a list of candidate use cases grounded in observed process, not in a workshop whiteboard.
For each candidate we check the unglamorous things: does the data exist, is it accessible, is it clean enough, and what would the model actually need to be right about. Several ideas usually die here, which is the point.
Every surviving use case gets a value estimate, a build estimate and a confidence rating. You get the arithmetic, not just the conclusion, so your finance team can argue with it.
The top-ranked opportunity gets scoped properly — architecture, evaluation approach, integration points, risks and a cost envelope — so it can go straight into a build without a second discovery phase.
Interviews, process shadowing, and a look at the systems and data involved. We correct our assumptions here rather than at the end.
Feasibility checks against real data and real constraints. Where a technical spike is the fastest way to answer a question, we run one.
The arithmetic on value and effort, the ranking, and a build-ready scope for whatever comes out on top.
Then we say so, and we say it in week two rather than week four. It happens on a minority of engagements and it is a cheaper outcome than discovering it six months into a build. You still keep the opportunity map and the feasibility notes.
No. The scope we hand over is written so any competent team can execute it, including yours. Roughly half of these engagements continue into an Automation build with us; the rest do not, and that is a fine outcome.
Expect around two hours a week from a sponsor, and three to five interviews of an hour each across the people who do the work. We do the rest.
A 30-minute call, no deck. Bring the workflow that frustrates you most and we will tell you whether it is worth automating.
Typically replies within one business day.